The Brexit Scam - An overview of the Brexit Scam

In this post I'll make some bald assertions that correctly characterise the scope and seriousness of the Brexit Scam.

In later posts I'll try to express the assumptions, facts and reasoning on which the following conclusions are based.

Be prepared for your assumptions about Brexit to be challenged.

1. The Referendum of 23rd June 2016 was unlawful
2. The result of the Referendum of 23rd June 2016 should be quashed
3. There has been no decision by the United Kingdom which complies with the requirements of Paragraph 1 of Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union
4. The judgements of the Divisional Court and the United Kingdom Supreme Court handed down, respectively, on 3rd November 2016 and 24th January 2017 are wrong.
5. In the absence of an Article 50 "decision" the purported notification letter of 29th March 2017 is either unlawful and/or of no legal effect.
6. The UK and EU27 cannot lawfully negotiate what Theresa May calls an "implementation period" and the EU27 calls a "transition period"
7. The UK and EU27 cannot currently lawfully negotiate what is commonly called a "free trade agreement". To attempt to do so would be ultra vires and contrary to EU Law.
8. The unlawful actions of the UK render the UK liable to damages which I would guess will amount to tens of billions of pounds!

The preceding list will, I anticipate, show you that my analysis of Brexit (more correctly referred to as "UKExit") differs enormously from the nonsense peddled by the UK media.

In future posts I'll progressively explain why I have reached the conclusions listed above so that you can decide whether there is any validity in my analysis.